September 11, 1906
While we are remembering September 11, 2001, let's acknowledge that today's anniversary remembrances do not belong only to Americans. Chileans remember September 11, 1973 with sorrow as great as ours.... and we should remember it also, but with shame.
Thankfully, not all September 11th remembrances are of sorrow or shame. One hundred years ago today, on September 11, 1906 in South Africa, the modern nonviolent movement, Mahatma Gandhi's Satyagraha, began.
Earlier today, scarecrow wrote:
Unlike others here, many of whom lost friends/acquaintences/family on 9/11, my reaction was a sense that we were about to lose our ability to think clearly without hatred. My first reaction was, “we’re about to become Israel and Palestine, and we will become lost in an endless cycle of revenge and counter-revenge, with no way out, and it doesn’t matter which side we think we’re on, because we will not be able to see that our first, most powerful instinct will be our worst.”
In the Palestinian/Israeli conflict, the side you think most justified in its actions depends on which event you think is the start of history. For Americans, too much of our thinking begins on 9/11 or some similar event in which we were attacked. And in this we’re not different from others; it is always hard for any people to view their own sense of justification and history in any other way, but almost impossible for the other side to see it the way we do. 9/11 rememberances are inevitable, but I’m afraid they’re only helpful if we try to view it from another’s perspective.
If we as “outsiders” can see that the Israelis and Palestinians must speak with each other to escape the cycle of violence, why cannot we see that we also have to speak with those we perceive as nothing but evil (and who see us exactly the same way). And if someone has a better plan for how humanity gets out this endless cycle, I’d like to hear it, cause so far, the conventional wisdom is not working.
Maybe there is an another way, with a different kind of wisdom...
Update: At a minimum, what if we never started the so-called "Global War on Terrorism" and instead we had responded with a world-wide police action for an organized crime syndicate of mass murderers? I'd think that there would have been far less victims of the violence that began with 9/11/2001... And we, along with the people of Afghanistan and Iraq would be safer... And maybe we'd have more of our values intact - as ProfWombat points out, "the criminal paradigm requires respect for law and institution, and the war paradigm legitimizes, if not encourages, their destruction".



%)

