<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NetRootsMass &#187; Corruption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netrootsmass.net/category/hughs-bush-scandals-list/corruption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netrootsmass.net</link>
	<description>common people for the common good</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 02:27:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>395.  Lax oversight at the Office of Thrift Supervision contributed to bank failures</title>
		<link>http://www.netrootsmass.net/2008/11/395-lax-oversight-at-the-office-of-thrift-supervision-contributed-to-bank-failures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netrootsmass.net/2008/11/395-lax-oversight-at-the-office-of-thrift-supervision-contributed-to-bank-failures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-candidate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugh's List of Bush Scandals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netrootsmass.net/?p=1402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A November 23, 2008 Washington Post story reports that lax oversight by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) allowed the savings and loan institutions it regulated to engage in dubious practices which led to $355.7 billion in thrift failures in 2008 and the need the to sell off other institutions to avoid failure.  Thrifts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A November 23, 2008 Washington Post <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27865780/">story</a> reports that lax oversight by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) allowed the savings and loan institutions it regulated to engage in dubious practices which led to $355.7 billion in thrift failures in 2008 and the need the to sell off other institutions to avoid failure.  Thrifts are usually smaller than commercial banks and concentrate more on home loans.  Even so, some of the names of institutions which failed or were sold are well known:  IndyMac, Washington Mutual, and Countrywide, for example (see item 87).</p>
<p>Across the board, the Bush Administration aggressively deregulated financial markets.  At the OTS this strategy was spearheaded by James Gilleran who headed the agency from 2001-2005.  In his first 3 years, he cut OTS&rsquo;s 1,200 staff by a quarter even as the value of the assets the agency oversaw increased by half.  Banks were also allowed to draw down their reserves on average by a third to the lowest level in 20 years.  To justify this, the OTS accepted unrealistic projections on what expected losses in the banks&rsquo; loan portfolios would be.  At the time thrifts were making more and more higher risk adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs), the OTS permitted them to assess the risk of these in terms of their introductory low rate and not the higher rate to which the loans would ultimately convert.  And no, these loans were not being to the poor.  As part of Gilleran&rsquo;s deregulation, government obligations to lend in low income communities were not strictly enforced.</p>
<p>The structure of the OTS was also at odds with its mission.  It had an inherent and fatal conflict of interest.  It was funded by the very banks it was tasked with regulating.  The bigger the bank the bigger the contribution.  So although the OTS oversaw some 750 banks, Washington Mutual (WaMu)  alone paid 13% of its budget.  The mortgage writer Countrywide which was actually recruited by the OTS to become a thrift on the promise that it would be loosely regulated accounted for another 5% of the OTS budget.</p>
<p>In short, the thrifts were paying the OTS not to regulate them, and in exchange for the budget it received from them the OTS turned a blind eye to their reckless behavior.  This arrangement worked out very well until the thrifts crashed and burned.  Who could have predicted . . .?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netrootsmass.net/2008/11/395-lax-oversight-at-the-office-of-thrift-supervision-contributed-to-bank-failures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>385.  Corruption in the missile defense program</title>
		<link>http://www.netrootsmass.net/2008/10/385-corruption-in-the-missile-defense-program/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netrootsmass.net/2008/10/385-corruption-in-the-missile-defense-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 05:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugh's List of Bush Scandals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netrootsmass.net/?p=1134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Cantrell was an engineer who worked on the Pentagon&#8217;s missile defense program (see items 73 and 338) in Hunstville, Alabama.  An October 11, 2008 story in the New York Times reports how he and his deputy Doug Ennis got the Pentagon to fund $350 million in worthless projects.  Cantrell would pitch his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Cantrell was an engineer who worked on the Pentagon&rsquo;s missile defense program (see items 73 and 338) in Hunstville, Alabama.  An October 11, 2008 <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/12/washington/12missile.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin">story</a> in the New York Times reports how he and his deputy Doug Ennis got the Pentagon to fund $350 million in worthless projects.  Cantrell would pitch his projects to contractors, like Lockheed Martin and pay lobbyists (illegal for civil servants) to sell them to members of Congress.  In return, he and Ennis received $1.6 million in kickbacks from contractors and protection from Senators like Ted Stevens (R-AK) (item 223) and Trent Lott (R-MS).  Other members of Congress involved in Cantrell&rsquo;s schemes included Senators Richard Shelby (R-AL) and Olympia Snowe (R-ME), and Representatives Curt Weldon (R-NY) and CW Young (R-FL).  At one point, Cantrell supervised a stable of 160 contractors and was handling $120 million worth of business a year for them.  His activities spanned the late 1990s to 2007.  He and Ennis are currently awaiting sentencing on bribery and conspiracy charges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netrootsmass.net/2008/10/385-corruption-in-the-missile-defense-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>382. More corruption in the government’s oil leasing programs</title>
		<link>http://www.netrootsmass.net/2008/10/382-more-corruption-in-the-government%e2%80%99s-oil-leasing-programs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netrootsmass.net/2008/10/382-more-corruption-in-the-government%e2%80%99s-oil-leasing-programs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 05:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cronyism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugh's List of Bush Scandals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.endordil.com/?p=1036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During the 2008 election, Republicans pushed oil drilling in offshore deepwater areas and in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR).  Such drilling would do little to alleviate our country&#8217;s long term energy needs.  Oil companies already hold millions of acres under lease which they have not developed.  Nor are there oil rigs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the 2008 election, Republicans pushed oil drilling in offshore deepwater areas and in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR).  Such drilling would do little to alleviate our country&rsquo;s long term energy needs.  Oil companies already hold millions of acres under lease which they have not developed.  Nor are there oil rigs available or pipelines built to exploit these new areas.  There are also technical questions about the feasibility of some deepwater drilling, and financial ones as well as oil prices declined in the latter part of 2008.  Even if action were taken in late 2008, the best guess timeframe for beginning to pump from them is 10 years.  Opening up new areas to leasing is, in fact, a giveaway of US resources and control of US territory to oil companies, a parting gift of Bush and Republicans to the oil industry.</p>
<p>Tied in with this is the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/11/washington/11royalty.html?hp">scandalous</a> way the government is compensated for these leases (see also item 172).  Since 1982, the government has allowed the oil industry to make royalty payments through the Mineral Management Service (MMS) under its Royalty in Kind (RIK) program.  Rather than paying cash, oil companies pay royalties in the form of crude oil and natural gas which the RIK then sells.  This is not a small enterprise.  The RIK handles around 150,000/bbls of crude oil and 800 million cubic feet of natural gas a day and does about $4 billion in business a year.  It is also totally corrupt.</p>
<p>On September 10, 2008, the Department of Interior Inspector General released 3 reports online which detailed activities within the RIK program.  These were based on investigations that took nearly two years and cost $5.3 million.  <a href="http://www.doioig.gov/upload/FBS%20REDACTED%20with%20Transmittal%209_10%20date.pdf">One</a> describes how three senior officials who had been with the RIK since its creation under Reagan colluded together to award two of them post-retirement six figure consulting salaries.  Lucy Denett was associate director of the Minerals Revenue Management which was a subsection of the MMS which oversaw the RIK.  She retired during the investigation on January 31, 2008.  Jimmy Mayberry was a  special assistant to Denett from 2000 to his retirement on January 3, 2003.  On his retirement, he formed a consulting company Federal Business Solutions (FBS).  Milton Dial was the assistant program director for the RIK 2001-October 2003 and retired September 2004.  Basically, what happened was that Denett asked Mayberry (with Dial&rsquo;s help) to write up a work proposal which both Denett and Dial knew FBS would bid on after Mayberry&rsquo;s retirement.  Dial then helped steer the contract to FBS, and Denett approved the deal.  On his own retirement, Dial went to work for FBS and got his own big salary consulting for the RIK through the FBS contract.  In August 2008, Mayberry pled guilty to criminal conflict of interest and was awaiting sentencing.  Denett&rsquo;s case was referred to the Public Integrity Section of the Justice Department but this being the Bush Administration, they declined to prosecute.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.doioig.gov/upload/Smith%20REDACTED%20FINAL_080708%20Final%20with%20transmittal%209_10%20date.pdf">second</a> report concerned Gregory Smith who was deputy program director for the RIK 2001-2004, its director from 2005 until he was detailed out in January 2007.  He retired in May 2007 during the course of the Inspector General&rsquo;s investigation.  Smith got approval for paid outside consulting work on technical issues.  This was a misrepresentation because what he was really doing was pitching the company for which he was consulting to companies he was doing business with in the RIK.  MMS resources and employees were used in furtherance of these aims.  Smith also received gifts from these companies in excess of government limits.  In addition, he had sex with two of his subordinates, one of whom was his secretary from whom he bought cocaine 4-5 times a year.  This was sometimes delivered to him at his office.  It came out as well that Smith had lied to OIG investigators previously and that he had instructed other RIK employees to do so.  The Inspector General referred his case too to the DOJ&rsquo;s Public Integrity Section and they declined to prosecute this one as well.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.doioig.gov/upload/RIK%20REDACTED%20FINAL4_082008%20with%20transmittal%209_10%20date.pdf">third</a> report looked at other employees of the MMS.  It noted that the MMS was based in Denver but was not overseen by the local director but by an inattentive Denett back in Washington.  This led to what the Inspector General called a &ldquo;culture of ethical failure.&rdquo;  Those who worked at the RIK thought the normal rules did not apply to them.  Nearly 1/3 of them socialized with or accepted gifts from oil industry representatives in contravention of government rules and, as the report relates, &ldquo;When confronted by our investigators, none of the employees involved displayed remorse.&rdquo;  Two RIK marketers liked to party so much with industry reps that they were given the name the &ldquo;MMS chicks&rdquo;.  They got so drunk at one event that they had to be put up at a company lodge rather than being allowed to drive back to their hotel.  One had a sex toy shop as a sideline for which she passed out cards.  Both used other drugs and had sexual encounters with oil company personnel.  Government employees are supposed to keep their contacts with private industry at arms length but as the report somewhat archly notes, &ldquo;Sexual relationships with prohibited sources cannot, by definition, be arms-length.&rdquo;  It says a lot about the mindset of those at the RIK that one of the marketers responded to this that she did not consider a one night stand to be a relationship.</p>
<p>Although employees at the RIK often stated that they did not think they had done anything wrong, they did sometimes try to hide or downplay the nature and extent of their socializing with oil industry representatives.  At one point in 2006, they even discussed forming a group to write up special ethical rules which would legitimize their activities.  The Inspector General left to the Secretary of the Interior what actions and sanctions were to be taken against those still employed in the MMS but indicated that firing would be appropriate for some.</p>
<p>Lack of oversight and the overly business friendly stance of the Bush Administration promoted an atmosphere of corruption, cronyism, and criminality at the RIK/MMS.   This was facilitated by industry representatives who should have known what the legal limits were even if their government contacts did not but had no problem involving themselves and their companies in a &ldquo;pay to play&rdquo; scheme that was little more than bribery.</p>
<p>On <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/02/the_daily_muck_755.php">February 4, 2009</a>, Milton <a href="http://www.katc.com/global/story.asp?s=9775377">Dial</a> received a minimum sentence of probation and a $2,000 fine for violating conflict of interest laws.  The judge actually apologized to Dial saying that &ldquo;high executives&rdquo; in our government go unpunished although they break this law all the time.  Apparently the judge&rsquo;s argument is that the small time thieves in the Bush Administration deserve our sympathy because they didn&rsquo;t steal as much as others.  This is accountability we can not believe in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netrootsmass.net/2008/10/382-more-corruption-in-the-government%e2%80%99s-oil-leasing-programs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>370. Renting public officials to pay for the Bush Library</title>
		<link>http://www.netrootsmass.net/2008/10/370-renting-public-officials-to-pay-for-the-bush-library/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netrootsmass.net/2008/10/370-renting-public-officials-to-pay-for-the-bush-library/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 04:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cronyism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugh's List of Bush Scandals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.endordil.com/?p=1011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A July 13, 2008 investigative report in the British Sunday Times related that Stephen Payne, lobbyist, Bush fundraiser, member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council, whom Bush has known for 20 years was offering to sell meetings with Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, Stephen Hadley, and John Negroponte for between $600,000 and $750,000.  The scam [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A July 13, 2008 investigative <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article4322684.ece">report</a> in the British Sunday Times related that Stephen Payne, lobbyist, Bush fundraiser, member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council, whom Bush has known for 20 years was offering to sell meetings with Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, Stephen Hadley, and John Negroponte for between $600,000 and $750,000.  The <strike>scam</strike> deal was that Payne would contribute a third to Bush&rsquo;s Presidential Library with the other 2/3 going to his lobbying company Worldwide Strategic Partners.  Such &ldquo;donations&rdquo; do not have to be reported even if made by foreigners, and there is no limit on their size.  In the Clinton Administration, Republicans were aghast that he was renting out the Lincoln bedroom.  Somehow I do not expect them to register the same outrage about renting out Bush officials.  Call it a wild guess.</p>
<p>As <a href="http://www.metimes.com/Security/2008/07/15/analysis_more_bush_library_sleaze_charges/7bab/">reported</a> on July 15, 2008, Payne was asked to resign from his DHS advisory position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netrootsmass.net/2008/10/370-renting-public-officials-to-pay-for-the-bush-library/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>360. KBR dodges an audit and ditches the auditor</title>
		<link>http://www.netrootsmass.net/2008/10/360-kbr-dodges-an-audit-and-ditches-the-auditor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netrootsmass.net/2008/10/360-kbr-dodges-an-audit-and-ditches-the-auditor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 04:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugh's List of Bush Scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.endordil.com/?p=987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charles Smith a civilian headed the Field Support Contracting Division of the US Army.  At the end of 2003, he was informed by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) that some $1 billion in costs from defense contractor KBR for work in Iraq could not be justified.  KBR at the time was a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/17/washington/17contractor.html">Charles Smith</a> a civilian headed the Field Support Contracting Division of the US Army.  At the end of 2003, he was informed by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) that some $1 billion in costs from defense contractor KBR for work in Iraq could not be justified.  KBR at the time was a subsidiary of Halliburton, the corporation that Vice President Cheney formerly headed.   When Smith raised his concerns, Tina Ballard Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army began pressuring him to quickly smooth the matter over.  Smith didn&rsquo;t and in August 2004 warned KBR in writing that if it couldn&rsquo;t justify its expenses, he would not set up review boards to pass on 2 percent bonuses for the company and that he would begin withholding 15% on future payment claims until the matter was resolved.   The day after this warning was transmitted, Smith&rsquo;s military boss Brigadier General Jerome Johnson told him to rescind it and the day after that Smith found he had been moved to a different job.  Jeffrey P. Parsons, executive director of the Army Contracting Command stated that &ldquo;This issue was not decided overnight.&rdquo;  This is very likely true.  It was probably discussed over two nights.  Subsequently, the Army hired an outside auditing firm RCI Holding to examine the KBR account.  Ignoring the DCAA audit and based on only sketchy information from KBR, RCI gave KBR a clean bill of health.  This cleared the way for KBR in early 2008 to receive part of a $150 billion 10 year contract for work in Iraq and for Serco, RCI&rsquo;s parent company, to be KBR&rsquo;s auditor for that contract.  Nope, no conflicts of interest there, nope, none at all, just good old fashioned arm twisting, string pulling, and back scratching.  What could be more American and patriotic than that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netrootsmass.net/2008/10/360-kbr-dodges-an-audit-and-ditches-the-auditor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

