Comments on: 226. The White House declares that Harriet Miers doesn’t have to answer a subpoena based on a legal opinion by a lawyer who legally should no longer be in his post http://www.netrootsmass.net/2008/09/226-the-white-house-declares-that-harriet-miers-doesnt-have-to-answer-a-subpoena-based-on-a-legal-opinion-by-a-lawyer-who-legally-should-no-longer-be-in-his-post/ common people for the common good Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:47:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: A conversation with Mr. “Conservative” ……. « After afterdowningstreet.org … What’s next? http://www.netrootsmass.net/2008/09/226-the-white-house-declares-that-harriet-miers-doesnt-have-to-answer-a-subpoena-based-on-a-legal-opinion-by-a-lawyer-who-legally-should-no-longer-be-in-his-post/#comment-236 A conversation with Mr. “Conservative” ……. « After afterdowningstreet.org … What’s next? Mon, 01 Dec 2008 08:21:55 +0000 http://www.endordil.com/?p=704#comment-236 [...] this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, and this, this, this, this, this, this, and this, this, this, and this … But no your right [...] [...] this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, and this, this, this, this, this, this, and this, this, this, and this … But no your right [...]

]]>